The recent controversy surrounding an NYSC corps member, Ushie Uguamaye, who criticized the Nigerian government and President Tinubu in a viral TikTok video, has sparked intense debate on the limitations of free speech, the role of corps members in national discourse, and the government’s handling of criticism. While Uguamaye’s grievances about inflation and economic hardship resonate with many Nigerians, her approach raises questions about the boundaries of responsible criticism, the NYSC code of conduct, and the government’s response to dissenting voices.
Uguamaye’s video was an emotional outburst of frustration, detailing her struggle with skyrocketing prices, unbearable living expenses, and a declining quality of life. She lamented that her NYSC allowance was insufficient to cover basic needs, questioning the government’s inaction regarding inflation. In her frustration, she described President Tinubu as “terrible,” saying that leadership should be accountable for the economic situation. Her statements were not isolated complaints but reflections of a broader reality—Nigeria’s economic downturn has affected millions, making daily survival a challenge even for those earning far more than a corps member’s stipend.
However, while her grievances are justified, the manner in which she conveyed them raises legitimate concerns. Criticizing a sitting president and branding him as “terrible” in a public outcry, especially while serving under a government-backed scheme, walks a fine line between free speech and perceived insubordination. The NYSC scheme is structured as a national service, not a civil service, meaning corps members are not government employees bound by traditional civil service rules. However, they are still expected to uphold discipline, neutrality, and decorum. Section 3(a) of the NYSC Act emphasizes the scheme’s role in inculcating discipline and patriotism in Nigerian youths. While this does not mean corps members must blindly support government policies, it does imply that their conduct should align with the values of national service.
The NYSC Bye-Laws (Revised 2011) further clarify these expectations. According to the regulations, “Any member who addresses the press on any policy issue without the written consent of the State Coordinator shall be tried by the Camp Court and, if found guilty, be liable to extension of service for thirty (30) days on half pay.” Similarly, “Any member who takes part in partisan politics is liable to extension of service for a period not less than three (3) months without pay.” Furthermore, “Any member who takes part in riot or mob action shall be reported to the police for prosecution.” The Bye-Laws also state that “Any member who is rude to constituted authority shall be tried by the Corps Disciplinary Committee and, if found guilty, be liable to extension of service for a period not less than thirty (30) days with half pay. ”While Uguamaye’s video was not an outright political campaign, it was made without authorization and contained inflammatory rhetoric that could be interpreted as agitation rather than a call for reform, potentially violating these regulations.
That said, the NYSC’s response to her video was deeply flawed and counterproductive. Instead of addressing the concerns raised, NYSC officials resorted to threats, intimidation, and coercion. The calls from NYSC officials, including the disrespectful remark, “Are you normal?” show a troubling intolerance for criticism. Rather than engaging in constructive dialogue or reassuring corps members that their concerns are noted, the NYSC chose to silence and humiliate her, reinforcing the perception that the government is hostile to dissenting voices.
This approach is neither sustainable nor democratic. Section 39 of the 1999 Constitution guarantees every Nigerian the right to freedom of expression. While this right has limitations under Section 45 to protect public order and morality, it does not justify suppressing legitimate concerns about economic hardship. Criticism of government policies should not automatically be equated with subversion or disrespect. Uguamaye’s video, however emotionally charged, was an expression of frustration shared by millions. Instead of branding her a troublemaker, the government and NYSC leadership should acknowledge the underlying issues she highlighted.
ALSO READ
- Apart from Nigeria, 10 other countries also have National Youth Service Corps (NYSC)
- Ex-corps members tell us how to navigate post-NYSC life
- EDITORIAL: Natasha, Akpabio and sexual harassment allegation
The economic reality in Nigeria is grim, and it is hypocritical to expect corps members—many of whom are fresh graduates struggling to survive on a meager allowance—not to voice their frustrations. The cost of living has risen to unbearable levels. Essential items that were once affordable now require a significant portion of one’s income. The transportation costs Uguamaye mentioned are not exaggerated; Uber fares, which used to be reasonably priced, have surged due to inflation and fuel price hikes. The government’s inability to provide reliable public transport has made ride-hailing services a necessity rather than a luxury. Similarly, her outrage over the cost of eggs is justified—food prices have skyrocketed, placing enormous strain on ordinary Nigerians. These are not political statements; they are economic realities.
Instead of harassing corps members who highlight these issues, the government should focus on meaningful solutions. Inflation must be tackled through concrete economic policies that stabilize prices and improve purchasing power. The NYSC scheme itself needs reform—paying corps members an allowance that no longer reflects the economic conditions of the country is unsustainable. A review of the NYSC allowance to reflect the current cost of living would be a step in the right direction. Furthermore, a more open channel of communication between corps members and government officials should be established, allowing them to express concerns without fear of intimidation.
Public service and national unity cannot be built on fear and silence. Nigeria’s democracy thrives on dialogue, accountability, and responsiveness to citizens’ grievances. If a corps member feels compelled to cry on social media about economic hardship, the real failure lies not in her choice of words but in a system that has made survival so difficult. The government must recognize that ignoring or suppressing criticism does not make problems disappear. A more engaged and responsive leadership—one that listens to its citizens rather than punishing them for speaking out—is the only way forward.
