Fuel subsidy returns: Govt reserves right to intervene in face of economic hardship, says presidential aide

Estimated reading time: 2 minutes

The Nigerian government has signaled a potential return of fuel subsidy, sparking debate about its economic impact.

In a press briefing on Friday, Mrs. Olu Verheijen, the Special Adviser to the President on Energy, addressed the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) claim that the government had brought back subsidies “through the back door.”

Verheijen acknowledged the government’s prerogative to intervene during times of economic hardship.

ALSO READ

• Russian President Putin warns European countries not to intervene in Ukraine crisis
• Arise Presidential Debate: The agenda towards a secure nation
• New Year: I’m aware of rising cost of living, Tinubu tells Nigerians
• FG reveals Nigeria accounts for 33% of Africa’s gas reserves
• NRTC WEEKLY: Top 5 trending stories across the country this week

While not explicitly confirming a full-fledged subsidy return, she emphasized the government’s commitment to maintaining price stability and preventing social unrest.

“The subsidy was removed on May 29th,” Verheijen stated. “However, the government has the right to take steps to address social unrest. They reserve the right to intervene.”

This statement suggests the government might be considering reintroducing subsidies intermittently to cushion the blow of economic hardship on Nigerians.

This news comes amidst rising concerns about inflation and the high cost of living. Fuel prices significantly impact transportation costs and the overall price of goods.

Reintroducing subsidies could offer temporary relief to citizens, but some experts warn of potential downsides.

Critics of fuel subsidies argue that they distort the market, encourage corruption, and place a heavy burden on the national budget.

They advocate for targeted social safety nets or deregulation of the sector as more sustainable solutions.

The debate over fuel subsidies is likely to continue. The government’s decision to reserve the right to intervene indicates a balancing act between economic concerns and the need to address the challenges faced by Nigerians during this period of hardship.